Tag Archives: egg

EGGS, NESTLINGS, AND FLEDGLINGS

AT WILD BALD EAGLE NESTS,
2006-2020

© elfruler 2020

The table presented on this page gives numbers of eggs, nestlings, and fledglings observed at wild Bald Eagle nests on streaming video cams or by credible ground observers from 2006-2020. (Click here for a list of nests providing data.)

Table 1 gives precise counts of eggs laid, chicks hatched, and eaglets fledged over the 15 breeding seasons, broken down by year and by clutch size (1-egg, 2-egg, 3-egg, 4-egg, 5-egg), with totals and percentages.

TABLE 1

Click on the Pop-Out button to open in a new tab.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Here are some highlights:
    • The data incorporate numbers from a total of 388 nesting seasons, resulting in 401 clutches of eggs including 12 second clutches after loss of the first clutch (see Notes at the bottom of the table).
    • Of the total clutches for the 15-year time frame,
      • 1-egg clutches made up 6.7% of total clutches;
      • 2-egg clutches made up 60.8% of total clutches;
      • 3-egg clutches made up 31.4% of total clutches;
      • 4-egg clutches made up 0.7% of total clutches.
    • A total of 910 eggs were laid.
    • The average number of eggs laid per clutch was 2.3.
    • 721 of the eggs hatched, or 79.2% of the eggs laid.
    • Of the clutches in which at least one egg hatched,
      • in 1-egg clutches, 44.4% of the eggs hatched;
      • in 2-egg clutches, 78.9% of the eggs hatched;
      • in 3-egg clutches, 83.3% of the eggs hatched;
      • in 4-egg clutches, 75% of the eggs hatched.
    • A total of 588 eaglets were confirmed to have fledged, either directly from the nest (571), or after rehab and release (17). This is 81.6% of nestlings hatched, or 64.7% of eggs laid.

In a handful of cases it is unknown whether a particular eaglet fledged, sometimes when the cam went down, or the cam angle made it impossible to follow an eaglet’s movements, or an eaglet had a misstep and fledged before it seemed ready and ground searches could not confirm it was safe.

Numbers can fluctuate up and down from one year to the next, and there is no clear trend in either direction.  For example:
    • 14.6% of the clutches in 2018 had 1 egg, none in 2019, and only 7% in 2020. The numbers of 3-egg nests jumped from 28.6% in 2013 to 41.4% in 2014, then dropped to 21.4% in 2015.
    • The total number of eggs hatched ranges from 66.7% in 2006 to 96.3% in 2012.
    • Sheer numbers can be deceptive. In 2020 a whopping 29 eggs were lost, but that is 70.7% of the total number of eggs laid that year, slightly below the average of 79.2% for all eggs hatched.
    • Confirmed fledges (directly from the nest and rescue/rehab) varies between 69.2% in 2012 and 93.5% the year before, 2011.

The fluctuations in the numbers actually reflect what observers have seen happen on the nests. Many factors affect the success of a given nest in a given year. These include weather, change of nest, change of mate, food availability, intruders and predators, and unusual events such poisoning and accidents. The variations also could be reflective of the relatively small sampling of nests.

NUMBERS FROM THE NESTS

WILD BALD EAGLES, 2006-2020

© elfruler 2020

The video cameras that have been trained on Bald Eagles’ nests since 2006 have provided a treasure trove of information about the breeding behavior of these apex raptors. In the universe of the more than 100,000 active Bald Eagle nests in North America, the data that these particular nests yield is minuscule. A few published scholarly reports on Bald Eagle nesting success focus mainly on a circumscribed area (e.g. Florida) for 1 or a few breeding seasons. The data here from the nests on cam span 15 years of breeding from 2006-2020 across a wide geographical expanse throughout the continent, and they represent the full range of climates and habits in which Bald Eagles reproduce. (Nests included in the data are listed here.)

Over the period, adult pairs at these nests made 401 breeding efforts at 85 locations, producing 910 eggs, 721 hatchlings, and at least 588 fledglings. These numbers might be considered a fair sampling of breeding data for the species.

The pages and tables that follow break down the data collected via these cameras on multiple levels. The raw numbers of eggs laid, nestlings hatched, and juveniles fledged, from nest to nest and year to year, yield statistics and percentages that give an overall view of breeding success over the 15 years. Burrowing more deeply into these numbers reveals how many clutches are successful over time, and which clutches of a particular size (1 egg, 2 eggs, etc.) are more successful than others. The numbers open a window into losses of eggs and eaglets, and what we can learn about reasons for those losses. And the numbers help flesh out some perceptions of behaviors of nesting Bald Eagles, such as coping with bad weather, predators, and intraspecific intruders (by other Bald Eagles), and replacing a lost clutch.

The data reinforce some facts that are already known:  Bald Eagles typically lay clutches of 2 eggs, with clutches of 3 eggs less common, clutches of 1 egg unusual, and clutches of 4 eggs quite rare. A fair number of eggs do not hatch, but a healthy majority end in successful fledges.

Other details to emerge from these analyses are perhaps more surprising:  While overall averages seem consistent with what is generally believed, there is often a wide range of values across seasons and from nest to nest.  In some years the number of eggs lost far exceeds the average, while in other years few eggs remain unhatched. Similarly, the number of nestlings that die before fledging covers a wide range among the years. Three-egg nests produce a higher percentage of fledges than either 2-egg nests or 1-egg nests; the latter are least successful in producing fledges.

These pages represent a complete revision of data that I published here in 2018, which consisted of a single page and 1 spreadsheet. For this new report I have pared down the nests to include only those with the most reliable observations, mainly the ones with streaming video cams, plus a small number of nests with reliable ground observers. I have also expanded the detail and breadth of information and analysis, resulting in 8 spreadsheets, and I have provided a narrative discussing each one. I have also compiled a lengthy list of References to literature on breeding, eggs, incubation, and survival.

These tables and narratives are presented in sequence in the pages that follow:
Additional new pages also make use of the nest data:
Full references for citations in the following pages are given here:

I began collecting data when I started watching web cams in 2009. Thanks to the Hancock Wildlife Foundation, the Institute for Wildlife Studies, spreadsheets compiled by Judy Barrows, nest cam websites and Facebook pages, and numerous individuals with whom I have communicated, I have been able to stretch the data back to 2006 when streaming cams first began operating. These sources also have been invaluable in filling in gaps in my own observations. I owe all of them a great debt of thanks.

 

BALD EAGLE NEST CAMERA BREEDING SEASON 2019-2020

I use short codes to refer to each nest. Click here for a key.
Click here for links to the nest cams.
Click here for calendars of egg-laying dates in past years.
A question mark ? indicates an approximate date or best guess.
Strikout indicates unhatched eggs.
Italics indicate nestlings that died before fledge.
< = by this date.

More detailed information can be found in
JudyB’s annual report on the nests.

NESTEGGSHATCHESFLEDGESNOTES
FL swf
clutch 1
11/12/19
11/16/19
12/19/19
unhatched
d. 1/15/20
---
eaglet ingested anticoagulant poison, broken blood feather led to fatal blood loss
TX web
new M?
12/12/19
12/15/19
1/17/20
1/19/20
4/6/20
fell 4/7/20,
rehab,
released 4/23/20
cam not streamed live, videos posted on Facebook
FL ece12/28/19
12/31/19
2/3/20
2/5/20
5/1/20
5/7/20
OK seq
new M?
1/4/20
1/7/20
1 broke 2/8/20
1 abandoned <2/15/20
---
---
intruder adult attacked 2/8/20, Mom possibly injured; unk which egg broke, which abandoned
CA bbl1/8/20
1/11/20
unhatched
unhatched
---
---
ravens ate eggs 3/15/20
GA ber1/11/20
1/14/20
1 broke 2/22/20
1 broke 3/11/20
---
---
unk which egg broke first
FL nef
new F & M
1/13/20
1/16/20
2/19/20
2/21/20
5/7/20
5/17/20
NJ duk
new F
1/20/20
1/24/20
2/26/20
3/1/20
both seen 6/25/20cam down
4/30/20 thru
end of season
TN dal1/22/20
1/25/20
1/28/20
2/29/20
3/2/20
3/4/20
fell 3/4/20
1 seen <6/8/20
1 seen <6/15/20
tree fell 4/29/20, cam down
TN blf1/27/20
1/30/20
2/3/20
3/5/20
3/7/20
3/11/20
5/29/20
5/29/20
6/5/20
MD tob2/3/20
2/6/20

2/9/20
3/14/20
hatch fail, 3/14/20
3/16/20
6/4/20?
---

6/5/20?
TN jns2/4/20
2/7/20
2/10/20
3/15/20
3/17/20
unhatched
6/3/20
6/5/20
---
male (Noshi) disappeared 4/24/20; intruder M appeared on cam 4/26/20
MN dnr
new F & M
2/6/20
2/9/20
2/12/20
3/15/20
3/17/20
3/19/20
6/16/20
6/20/20
d. <4/13/20
E3 failed to thrive, possibly starved
AZ gfd
new nest
new M
clutch 1
2/9/20?------new M didn't incubate; nest
abandoned 2/18/20
MI arb<~2/16/20
?
3/20/20?
?
6/9/20
?
CA red
no cam
2/11/20?
?
3/22/20?
<4/12/20
6/17/20?
?
PA frm
new cam
2/13/20
2/16/20

2/19/20
3/25/20
hatch fail, 3/25/20
3/26/20
6/14/20
---

<6/16/20
PA han2/13/20
2/17/20
broke 3/29/20
broke 2/17/20
---
---
PA pit2/13/20
2/16/20
3/21/20
3/23/20
6/11/20
6/6/20
IL umr2/14/20
2/17/20
3/23/20
3/24/20
6/10/20
6/16/20
tree fell in derecho 8/10/20
CA robat least 2
<2/27/20
2 hatched
<3/25/20
<6/10/20
<6/10/20
CO fsv2/14/20
2/17/20

2/21/20
1 hatch 3/29/20
1 hatch <3/31/20
1 unhatched
1 d. ~4/16/20
<6/12/20
cams off 3/16/20 due to coronavirus; unk which egg unhatched; unk which chick d., probably weather related
WV shp2/17/20
2/20/20
3/25/20
3/27/20
fell 3/27/20
6/13/20
CA cWE
new M
clutch 1
2/20/20
2/23/20
ravens predated
both 2/24/20
---
---
new M didn't incubate consistently
IA dnn2/21/19
2/24/20
3/30/20
3/31/20
d. 4/10/20
6/9/20
DN11's death cause unk
CA zSC
new nest
clutch 1
2/21/20broke at lay---
FL swf
clutch 2
2/22/20
2/25/20
3/31/20
4/2/20
6/15/20 accid
7/1/20
102d after clutch 1 first egg, 38d after clutch 1 eaglet d.
NY ctr2/22/20
?
?
3/31/20
<4/2/20
<4/5/20
6/18/20?
6/20/20?
<6/26/20
IA urb
new nest
2/25/20
2/28/20
3/2/20
4/3/20
4/6/20
4/7/20
6/22/20
6/25/20
6/29/20
IA dec2/26/20
2/29/20
3/4/20
4/5/20
4/5/20
4/8/20
6/18/20
6/21/20 accid
6/21/20
IN ndl2/26/20
2/29/20
3/4/20
4/4/20
4/6/20
4/9/20
6/23/20?
6/26/20
d. 5/14/20
BC sur2/27/20
3/1/20
4/5/20
4/6/20
6/28/20
6/28/20
CA cTH2/27/20
3/1/20
4/5/20
broke 3/20/20,
infertile
6/26/20
---
MT mil3 by 3/6/20<4/5/20
<4/7/20
<4/14/20
<6/18/20?
<6/20/20?
<6/28/20?
CA zSC
clutch 2
2/29/20
3/4/20
3/7/20
broke in 3 hrs
broke <3/5/20
broke <3/11/20
---
---
---
OH avn3/1/20

3/4/20
3/7/20
4/10/20

4/11/20
4/12/20
6/18/20 accid (BDOW)
1 d. 4/26/20
6/29/20
unk which chick d. or cause
CO std3/1/20
3/4/20
3/7/20
unhatched
4/12/20
unhatched
---
d. 4/14/20
---
intruder F attacked 4/6/20; eaglet d. of hypothermia or starved; magpie took eaglet's body 4/15/20; M stopped incubating
BC dl23/1/20
3/4/20
3/7/20
1 unhatched
4/11/20
4/12/20
---
7/1/20 accid
7/4/20 accid
unk which egg unhatched
OH ash
new cam
3/1/20
3/4/20
4/7/20
4/10/20
6/24/20
6/24/20
IA dav3/6/20
3/9/20
3/12/20
unhatched
4/14/20
4/17/20
---
<7/4/20
<7/4/20
egg #1 gone 3/7/20?, unk cause
TN har3/9/20?
3/12/20?
<4/16/20
4/18/20
<7/6/20
<7/6/20
BC wht3/10/20
3/13/20
unhatched
4/18/20
---
7/2/20
AZ gfd
clutch 2
~3/10/20------new M didn't incubate; abandoned
<3/25/20
CA cWE
clutch 2
3/18/20

3/21/20
raven predated,
3/20/20
raven predated, 3/29/20
---

---
BC hrn3/28/20
3/31/20 ?
5/5/20
<5/9/20
7/28/20
8/2/20
AK ken4/22/20
4/25/20
5/31/20
6/2/20
8/19/20
d. from fall, 6/22/20
M (Redoubt) disappeared 6/18/20; possible intruder

Hatching Eaglet

Here is a rare bird’s-eye (pun intended) view of how an eaglet uncurls itself from inside the egg in the final stage of hatching. This video is of the hatch of BC14 on 3/11/19 at 10:32 at the Tennessee Bluff City cam, operated by East Tennessee State University.  I’ve slowed the stream to 10% of normal speed and added arrows to indicate the back, head, left wing, right wing, beak, tail, legs and feet, egg tooth (yes! the egg tooth!), umbilicus, and receding yolk sac of the new hatchling.  The eaglet has its back to us and its head is down, tail up.

INTRASPECIFIC INTRUSIONS AT BALD EAGLE NESTS

© elfruler 2018

intraspecific adj. : occurring within a species or involving members of one species.” (www.merriam-webster.com)

Bald Eagles choose their breeding territories and nest sites carefully, driven by factors that will lead to success in raising their young.  These factors include adequate food resources, a sturdy nest platform, available shelter from dangerous weather, ease of defense, and tolerable distance from disturbances.  A good location will be attractive to any Bald Eagles that come along, and it is not surprising that a resident Bald Eagle pair will be challenged by other Bald Eagles for the site, leading to competition between members of the species, or intraspecific conflict.

It is not uncommon for one or both members of a pair to be challenged even before the nesting season begins, resulting in displacement, injury, and even death.  Conflicts that occur once a clutch of eggs has been laid or a brood of chicks has hatched can cause loss of eggs and chicks, despite the fierce defense that the parents inevitably mount against intruders.  Often the parents are successful in repelling a challenge and their chicks fledge.  In rare cases an intruder is accepted by the resident pair as a cooperative breeder (Go here for a series of pages about Cooperative Breeding and its occurrence among Bald Eagles).

The Bald Eagle nests that have been viewed on camera or monitored carefully from the ground since 1992 have provided a glimpse of intraspecific intrusions of many types and with a variety of outcomes:

  • Events before, during, and after the season
  • From one to many intruders
  • Intruding males and females, adults, subadults, and juveniles
  • Replacements, disappearances, injuries, and deaths of parents
  • Unhatched or broken eggs and injured or slain nestlings
  • Double clutches
  • Rescued nestlings and rehabbed fledglings
  • Successful fledges
  • Cooperative breeding

Even careful monitoring of cams and nests don’t provide the full picture of events surrounding intrusions, which often take place out of human view.  Even happenings in full view do not always have clear-cut explanations.

  • How many intruders are in the area?
  • When did they first appear?
  • What encounters occur off-nest between intruders and residents?
  • What is the sex or age of an intruder?
  • Does a resident eagle disappear because it has been injured or killed, or because it has decided that it cannot prevail in a battle?
  • Was an egg broken by an intruder or an agitated parent, or because it was unviable or infertile?
  • Did an egg fail to hatch because intruders interrupted the reproductive cycle and prevented fertilization?
  • Why would one intruder destroy eggs or chicks but another intruder leave eggs or chicks undamaged?
  • Does a resident adult respond primarily defensively to an intruder, or might there be a trigger that precipitates an offensive response?
  • Why would an intruder become a helper and cooperative breeder rather than a threat?

Answers to such questions would provide a much better understanding of events we can see, but too often the answers elude us.

The number of Bald Eagle nests for which reliable daily reports have been made more than doubled from 2008 to 2018 – from 24 to 57.  They range from southern California to New England, from south Florida to Alaska, and many points on the continent inbetween.  The nests are found in a variety of habitats, including rural farmland, along rivers and streams, lakes and bays, in woodlands in parks and wildlife refuges, on coastal islands, college campuses, and in city neighborhoods.  Yet it cannot be claimed that these nests are a representative sampling of all of the thousands of Bald Eagle nests in North America.

Nor can we be sure that we have witnessed every conceivable behavior or outcome associated with intraspecific intrusions.  The information that I present here is illustrative of certain types of Bald Eagle behavior, but should not be taken as a statistical report on intraspecific intrusions.

This first chart (at this link) describes the intraspecific intrusions observed at Bald Eagle nests from 1992 through 2018, the nest locations and habitats, what is known about the intruders, the events, and the outcomes.  (Link opens in a new browser tab.)  Losses (of parents, eggs, or chicks) can result directly or indirectly from intrusions, or they may occur for other reasons not related to intraspecific conflict.  Not every intrusion leads to a loss.

This second chart (follow this link) summarizes the details and gives percentages to enable comparison of intrusions, losses, and fledges from one year to the next.  (Link opens in a new browser tab.)  The percentages are number of intrusion events (nest intrusions, clutch intrusions, eggs lost, etc.) compared to the total number observed (nests, clutches, eggs., etc.) in that season.  (The years 1992-2007 at the California West End nest are not included in this summary because of the outsized effect of DDE contamination on egg production there.)  Notably, for these nests there is no clear trend in the percentages over time.

  • While 2018 clearly was a bad year for nest intrusions (including both before and during a clutch), at 24.6% of observed nests, 2008 was almost as bad, at 20.8% of observed nests.
  • On the other hand, 2008 was a worse year for clutch intrusions (after eggs were laid), at 19.2% compared to 17.9% in 2018.
  • And in 2008, 4.5% of chicks were lost, compared to a much smaller 1.3% in 2018.
  • The number of eggs lost was a staggering 11.3% in 2018, but the 8.6% of eggs lost in 2008 is the second highest percentage.
  • The year 2013 was difficult, with 13.6% of clutch intrusions and 6.7% of egg losses.
  • Some years were relatively benign: 2011 saw only one intrusion and 2012 only two.  A dip in losses occurred in 2015 and in intrusions in 2016.
  • From 2013-2017 most percentages were relatively stable – nest intrusions, clutch intrusions, losses – with an overall dip in 2016. Intrusions and losses in 2018 were severe, and it remains to be seen in coming seasons whether that year was an outlier.
BRIEF UPDATE ON THE 2018-2019 SEASON: I have not yet added new information to the charts, but the number of intraspecific intrusions declined significantly from the year before. Only 6 such intrusions occurred, only 2 of which happened after eggs were laid. 2 nests ended up with no eggs laid, and a total of 4 eggs were lost. No eaglets were lost.

There is no question that suitable habitat for nesting Bald Eagles is on the decline across the continent because of human development and encroachment.  But the numbers we have for these particular nests do not necessarily mean that increasing numbers of nest intrusions point to an approaching saturation of carrying capacity for Bald Eagles across the board.  Each territory has its own conditions that may or may not be either conducive or resistant to nest intrusions.  Increasing population density in a particular area may simply drive some Bald Eagles to adapt by seeking out previously unclaimed territories, by gradually shrinking the size of their territories (over time) to allow for more nests (if the food supply allows for it), or by allowing more instances of cooperative breeding.  It remains to be seen whether intraspecific intrusions will have a negative impact on the Bald Eagle population in the long run.  Some have argued that a rise in population density ultimately could result in a state of population equilibrium by slowing the breeding productivity to offset the long period of increase that followed the banning of DDT in 1972.

While the snapshots that these observed nests provide give us some narratives about intraspecific intrusions at Bald Eagle nests and make comparisons possible, a broader understanding of the causes and effects of such intrusions, as well as a glimpse of what they may entail in the future, must await more detailed and systematic studies (such as Mougeot et al. 2013 in Saskatchewan and Turrin and Watts in the Chesapeake Bay, 2014 and 2015).

For perspective on the Bald Eagle population in North America and trends over time, Partners in Flight (PIF) estimates the number of breeding-aged Bald Eagle individuals in 2017 at around 250,000, based on data from the North America Breeding Bird Survey, an approximate 131% increase since 1970.  The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s oft-cited number of about 10,000 breeding pairs (or 20,000 individuals) in the lower 48 United States in 2007 does not include numbers from Canada or Alaska (both of which exceed the number in the lower 48 states), and it represents only eagles in pairs that are actively breeding.  The PIF estimate encompasses all individual Bald Eagles throughout North America of breeding age whether they have formed breeding pairs or not.  None of these numbers include juvenile or subadult Bald Eagles, which could more than double the totals.

 There is as yet no sign that the Bald Eagle population is declining, whether because of habitat changes that lead to overpopulation and intraspecific conflict in a territory, or other causes such as contaminants, trauma, electrocution, disease, poisoning, and poaching.  In 2010, following the removal of the Bald Eagle from the list of threatened and endangered species, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service produced a Post-delisting Monitoring Plan for the Bald Eagle.  The Plan establishes a 20-year monitoring period (roughly four generations of breeding Bald Eagles) in the lower 48 states, with data analyzed and reported to the public every 5 years.  The Plan will yield information on changes in numbers and their causes, and it includes provisions for responding to a 25% or greater decline with corrective action by federal, state, and local agencies, Native American Tribes, and other interested partners.  The Plan specifically references the possibility of re-listing the Bald Eagle as threatened and/or endangered as a remedy to an unacceptable level of decline.

REFERENCES

Dzus, E.H. and J.M. Gerrard 1993.  Factors influencing Bald Eagle densities in northcentral SaskatchewanThe Journal of Wildlife Management 57: 771-778.

Elliott, K.H, J.E. Elliott, L.K. Wilson, I. Jones, and K. Stenerson 2011.  Density-dependence in the survival and reproduction of Bald Eagles: linkages to chum salmonThe Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 1688-1699.

Farmer, C.J., L.J. Goodrich, E. Ruelas I., and J.P. Smith  2008.  Conservation Status of North America’s Birds of Prey.  In K.L. Bildstein, J.P. Smith, E. Ruelas I., and R.R. Veit (eds). State of North America’s Birds of Prey.  Nuttall Ornithological Club and American Ornithologists.  Union Series in Ornithology No. 3. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Washington, D.C., 303-420.

Grubb, T.G., L.A. Forbis, M. McWhorter, and D.R. Sherman 1988.  Adaptive perch selection as a mechanism of adoption by a replacement Bald EagleThe Wilson Bulletin 100: 302-305.

Hancock Wildlife Foundation Forum.

Hornby Eagle Group Projects Society.  Our Nature Zone.

Hunt, W.G. 1998.  Raptor floaters at Moffat’s equilibriumOikos 82: 191-197.

Institute for Wildlife Studies.  Channel Islands EagleCAM Forum.

Jenkins, J.M. and R.E. Jackman 1993.  Mate and nest site fidelity in a resident population of Bald EaglesThe Condor 95: 1053-1056.

JudyB.  Watching Eaglets Grow.

Mahaffy, M.S. and L.D. Frenzel 1987.  Elicited territorial responses of northern Bald Eagles near active nestsThe Journal of Wildlife Management 51:551-554.

Markham, A.C. and B.D. Watts.  Documentation of infanticide and cannibalism in Bald EaglesJournal of Raptor Research 41: 41-44.

Mougeot, F. 2004.  Breeding density, cuckoldry risk and copulation behaviour during the fertile period in raptors: a comparative analysisAnimal Behaviour 76: 1067-1076.

Mougeot, F., J. Gerrard, E. Dzus, B. Arroyo, P.N. Gerrard, C. Dzus, and G. Bortolotti 2013.  Population trends and reproduction of Bald Eagles at Besnard Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada 1968-2012Journal of Raptor Research 47: 96-107.

Partners in Flight.

Turrin, C. and B.D. Watts 2014.  Intraspecific intrusion at Bald Eagle nestsArdea 102: 71-87.

Turrin, C. and B.D. Watts 2015.  Nest guarding in Chesapeake Bay Bald EaglesJournal of Raptor Research 49: 18-28.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Watts, B.D., G.D. Therres, and M.A. Byrd 2007.  Status, distribution, and the future of Bald Eagles in the Chesapeake Bay areaWaterbirds 30: 25-38.

Watts, B.D., G.D. Therres, and M.A. Byrd 2008.  Recovery of the Chesapeake Bay Bald Eagle nesting populationThe Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 152-158.

HATCHING!

You know about the internal pip, the egg tooth, and the external pip. But do you know about symmetrical hatching, the complexus muscle, gas exchange via the chorioallantoic membrane, nidicolous chicks, and semialtricial species? If you’re interested in a slightly different presentation of hatching, check this out.

HATCHING

© elfruler 2018, 2021
with thanks to Donna Young

The avian egg is a marvel of nature, a self-enclosed and perfectly effective living environment for the developing bird embryo. The shell  is sturdy but flexible, hard but porous. The egg contains all that is necessary to enable a small and weak organism to develop into a chick with all its parts and enough strength and skill to break through and emerge into the outside world. Here is an account of the many factors involved in a chick’s hatching.

Inside the shell

  • The eggshell is a complex structure of hard calcium carbonate crystals interwoven with collagen fibers and coated by a thin layer of crystalline calcite and smooth protein cuticle. The structure is sturdy to protect the developing embryo, yet permeable with microscopic pores that allow oxygen to pass into the egg and carbon dioxide and water vapors to pass out.
  • Two soft keratin membranes line the inside of the shell, both formed in the isthmus of the oviduct a few hours after fertilization. These membranes facilitate the exchange of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water through the hard shell. The outer membrane becomes fused to the inside of the shell near the time of hatching, and the thinner membrane lines the inner surface of the outer membrane. A gap between the two membranes forms a small air cell in the large (blunt) end of the egg, which will become very important when hatching is near.
  • A third membrane is adjacent to the inner shell membrane, the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), which surrounds the embryo and effects the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide via a network of blood capillaries connecting it to the embryo. It also collects wastes that cannot be evaporated through the shell from the growing embryo, which it sheds after the egg hatches. The CAM is homologous to the mammalian placenta.
  • The embryo is attached to the yolk sac — which contains fat and protein to feed the growing chick — by a cord, the umbilicus, leading into the abdominal cavity.
  • The yolk sac is greatly reduced in size by hatching time. Now the egg weighs less than when it was laid because it has absorbed and metabolized fats from the yolk and lost evaporated water through the shell. At hatch a Bald Eagle egg might weigh 91-102 g (3.2-3.6 oz.), as opposed to 113-127 g (4-4.5 oz.) when laid.
  • The eggshell itself is much thinner at hatch than when the egg was laid because the chick has absorbed much of the shell’s calcium into its developing bones.
  • Starting about a third of the way through 36-39 days of the embryo’s growth in the egg, an “egg tooth” or “pipping tooth,” a small, hard, sharp protuberance of calcified keratin on the beak’s upper mandible, begins to develop. Here is a closeup of the egg tooth on a hatchling eaglet at the Institute for Wildlife Studies. The egg tooth gradually wears away within a couple of weeks after hatch.
  • A muscle in the back of the chick’s neck (the complexus or hatching muscle) swells in response to the influx of lymphatic fluids. This muscle recedes in size after hatching (although it later plays a role in neck extension in grown eagles).

The hatching process

  • When hatching nears, the air cell in the large (blunt) end of the egg quickly expands and spreads partway down along the upper side of the egg.
  • As the embryo nears full development it takes up most of the space inside the shell – it is crowded in there! The chick has gradually rolled to curl up tightly, lying on its left side with its legs bent in the smaller end of the shell, its back against the air cell. Its head is tucked forward against its breast near the blunt end of the shell and turned to the right under its right wing. This puts the beak and the egg tooth close to the air cell. Here is a drawing of the position of the chick in a chicken egg at 20 days, just before hatching.
  • As it takes hatching position, the embryo absorbs the remainder of the yolk sac into its abdominal cavity.
  • The complexus muscle begins to contract, causing the entire body of the chick to straighten and contract, pushing the egg tooth against the air cell and piercing it. This results in what is called the internal pip. The air cell releases a small supply of oxygen and prompts the chick’s lungs and its 9 air sacs to begin functioning.
  • With its lungs now working, the chick can also begin to vocalize, as can be heard in this video of an egg just as it pips the shell at the Institute for Wildlife Studies incubation facility in 2008.
  • After the internal pipping the chick rests as its lungs learn to directly inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide. At this point the blood circulation and gas exchange via the CAM (chorioallantoic membrane) are winding down and the cord that connects the CAM to the embryo begins to wither.
  • After a few hours the buildup of carbon dioxide inside the shell stimulates the complexus muscle to contract more. The head and beak begin to jerk back against the shell repeatedly and the spine and legs push against the shell, finally piercing it with the egg tooth near the blunt end of the egg. This is seen from the outside as a “pip” or tiny hole or crack in the shell, usually on the side of the shell and near the larger end of the egg (but note that the beginning of a pip is often not in view on a nest cam). This is called the external pip.
  • After the first external pip that allows outside oxygen into the egg, the chick usually rests again for several more hours while its respiratory and circulatory systems continue to adapt.
  • The external pip accelerates fluid loss inside the egg as well as in the chick’s body, which is good because a slightly reduced body mass allows the chick more room to maneuver as it pushes against the shell.
  • The pip may begin as a tiny hole that increases in size over the next few hours. Or it may begin as a cracking of tiny bits of the shell, possibly taking a star-like appearance (“starring”). As the chick pushes outward, small bits of shell may bulge from the hole, often visible in profile as the pip is turned to the side. The chick’s legs flex and contract and the egg tooth pokes and scrapes the shell, creating larger holes and cracks. The chick’s beak, pipping tooth, and head might be visible through some of the cracks. The enlarged complexus muscle at the nape provides cushioning and support during this shell-breaking process.
  • As it pushes against the shell, the chick may begin to rotate, usually counterclockwise, perhaps halfway or more around the inside, until a part of the shell, often a roundish disc at one end, or a “cap,” separates and breaks the shell apart. This has led to the term symmetrical hatching, referring to the more or less symmetrical shape of both the broken-off cap and the rest of the egg. Symmetrical hatching is the norm for most avian species.
  • However, as observers of Bald Eagle cams over the years have noted, not all hatches result in a symmetrical breakup of the shell; in fact, some hatches look downright chaotic and messy. Sometimes the first external pip seems to simply grow in size until the chick breaks through the gap. Sometimes the shell membrane holds the shell together so that it does not break apart cleanly and the chick has to push through both shell and membrane to be free.
  • The hatching process is strenuous and can take up to 72 hours to complete.  The chick rests inbetween efforts to break through the shell.
  • Most biologists and observers consider the egg to be “hatched” when the chick fully emerges free from the shell.
  • The new hatchling is covered with a thin layer of downy feathers – its natal down – which is damp from the fluids inside the shell, matted against its mostly pinkish skin (but dark gray around the eyes). The down will dry out to a soft light gray color within a couple of hours.
  • The hatchling weighs about three-quarters of the weight of the egg when first laid about 37-39 days before – decreasing from about 113-127 g (4-4.5 oz.) to about 85 g (3 oz.). (Sizes vary with latitude – larger in the north than in the south – and also with hatch order – first eggs in a clutch are larger than subsequent eggs.)
  • After hatching the chick will lie in the nest resting for several hours. It will roll about a little, and the wings, legs, neck, and head may jerk spasmodically from time to time. Its breathing can be seen, and it will let out some tiny cheeps, which can be both heard and seen.

Parental behavior during hatching

  • The parents are aware of the hatching when they hear the chick’s vocalizations and possibly also its pecking at the shell. The incubating adult may stand above or to the side of the egg and lean in or cock its head, seeming to listen. Parents may chirp softly to the chick, or champ or click their beaks, perhaps another attempt to communicate.
  • They might continue to gently nudge the hatching egg and even the emerging chick with their beak.
  • They may exhibit restlessness in the egg cup, rising to check the eggs every few minutes, circling the cup, leaning in often to listen. They often pull soft nesting material in toward the nest cup (sometimes building a wall between the cup and the viewers!).
  • Both parents, but especially the male as the female does more of the incubating, may bring food to the nest in anticipation of both the chick’s and the mother’s need for food as brooding begins.
  • The parents do not assist the chick in breaking the shell because they could damage the still fragile blood vessels in the CAM. They may move shell fragments away from the hatching egg.

Post-hatching

  • Bald Eagle hatchlings are “semi-altricial,” which means they are nearly helpless when they hatch, with limited motor skills and strength, entirely dependent on parents for food and warmth, and confined to the nest (“nidicolous” – “nest inhabiting”). All raptors are semi-altricial and must spend several weeks being cared for by their parents in the nest before they fledge and are capable of fending for themselves.
  • Raptors are not considered fully altricial (like songbirds and parrots) because their eyes are open at hatch, they are covered with downy feathers, and they have some mobility.
  • At the other end of the developmental spectrum from altricial are “precocial” chicks, like geese, ducks, swans, chickens, quail, etc., which are capable of walking (and often swimming) and thermoregulating soon after they hatch. They are “nidifugous” (“nest fleeing”), meaning they leave the nest almost immediately after hatching.
  • In the days before it hatched the eagle chick has absorbed the yolk sac into its body, whose nutrients feed it in the few hours before and after hatch. It will not need to be fed by its parents for several hours.

Clearly, hatching is a complex process, and most of the time it ends successfully.  Sometimes, though, things can go wrong.  This page surveys reasons why an egg might fail to hatch.

Here is a compilation video of the hatch of the first eaglet at the West End nest on Catalina Island on 20 March 2018.
Detailed description of the development of a chicken embryo from fertilization through hatch, with great drawings and images.

References

  • Bond, G.M., V.D. Scott, and R.G. Board 1986. Correlation of mechanical properties of avian eggshells with hatching strategies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London (A) 209:225-237.
  • Bond, G.M., R.G. Board, and V.D. Scott 1988.  An account of the hatching strategies of birds.  Biological Review 63:395-415.
  • Bortolotti, G.R. 1984.  Physical development of nestling Bald Eagles with emphasis on timing of growth events. Wilson Bulletin 96:524-542.
  • Deeming, D.C. 2002.  Avian Incubation: Behaviour, Environment, and Evolution (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Deeming, D.C. and S.J. Reynolds, eds. 2015.  Nests, Eggs, and Incubation: New Ideas about Avian Reproduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Drent, R. 1973.  The natural history of incubation. In Breeding Biology of Birds: Proceedings of a symposium on breeding behavior and reproductive physiology in birds, Denver, Colorado, February 1972, ed. D.S. Farner (Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences):262-322.
  • Fox, N. 1995.  Understanding the Bird of Prey (Surrey, British Columbia and Blaine, WA: Hancock House Publishers).
  • Gill, F.B. 2007.  Ornithology, 3rd ed.  (New York: W. H. Freeman and Company).
  • Hamburger, V. and R. Oppenheim 1967. Prehatching motility and hatching behavior in the chick. Journal of Exp. Zool. 166:171-204
  • Lovette, I.J. and J.W. Fitzpatrick, eds. 2016.  The Cornell Lab of Ornithology Handbook of Bird Biology, 3rd ed. (Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • Oppenheim, Ronald W. 1972. Prehatching and hatching behaviour in birds: a comparative study of altricial and precocial species. Animal Behaviour 20:644-655.
  • Podulka, S., R.W. Rohrbaugh, Jr., & R. Bonney, eds. 2004.  Handbook of Bird Biology, 2nd ed. (Ithaca, NY: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology).
  • Proctor, N.S. and P.J. Lynch 1993.  Manual of Ornithology: Avian Structure & Function (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
  • Sharpe, P. 1995.   Guide to Bald Eagle Egg Incubation and Chick-Rearing.  Institute for Wildlife Studies.
  • Starck, J. M. and R.E. Ricklefs, eds. 1998.  Avian Growth and Development Evolution within the Altricial-Precocial Spectrum (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).

 

CLUTCHES, EGGS, and FLEDGES

These numbers come from all Bald Eagle nests for which I have records, including those observed on camera and from the ground.  See here for a list of these nests.  Excluded from these data are nests in aviaries where non-releasable eagles are provided with food, medical, and other care (Carolina Raptor Center in NC and American Eagle Foundation in TN).

Click on the chart to enlarge.

© elfruler 2018

OVIPOSITION (Egg-laying)

By Donna Young and elfruler
Updated 10/27/18

© elfruler 2018

  • Every female Bald Eagle has her own style of laying an egg that is usually consistent from egg to egg and year to year, although some variations in behavior may occur.  Any departure from a previously observed style may indicate a new female.
  • Rough predictions of when a first egg may be laid at a particular nest can be made on the basis of past years, since a pair tends to lay within a one- or two-week timeframe every year.  A significant departure from timing may point to a change of female, male, or both.  Click here for calendars of egg-laying at Bald Eagle nests observed on live cameras since 2006 (arranged by month).
  • Timing of the first egg is the hardest to predict, but second and third (and in the rarest of cases, fourth) eggs will come at 3-day or 4-day intervals (never fewer than about 69 hours, and only rarely after more than 96 hours).  See this page for statistics showing the time intervals at the eagle cams.

We have compiled a list of behaviors associated with egg-laying (oviposition) that we have observed over ten years of watching Bald Eagle cams online.  We divide the signs into three periods: Prelude, The Main Event, and Postlude.  A few signs are seen in all instances of oviposition, but we emphasize that no two events are alike, even with one specific bird.

 

PRELUDE

  • Nest preparation
    • For a few days before oviposition both male and female usually will spend more time in the nest, bringing in and arranging materials, especially the softer grasses, leaves, fronds, etc. that form the small cup where the egg(s) will be laid. They may dig with their beaks in the cup to help define and deepen it.  Exceptions to this do occur – sometimes there is not much soft material to form a clear cup.
    • Also for several days both parents probably will lie for a time in the nest cup, sometimes scraping backwards with their feet and pulling the soft materials in toward the boundary of the cup, all of which helps form it into a clear rounded indention.
  • Behavior
    • The female may begin to exhibit increasing lethargy for a day or few days before oviposition.  She may stand in the nest or lie in the cup almost motionless for minutes or even hours.  This is a great tease, and it may or may not lead immediately to egg-laying.   Observable lethargy does not always occur.
    • In some instances she may be absent from the nest just before oviposition, flying in (probably from a nearby perch) at the last minute.
    • Just before oviposition she may seem restless, lying down and standing up, or circling the nest cup.  She may rearrange the nest materials, dig in them with her beak or scrape with her feet.
    • Her mate may bring her a gift of food in the hours or minutes preceding oviposition, which she will confiscate and usually mantle, and she may whine to communicate that he is to leave it for her.  He will concede.

Female at MN DNR nest, 1/28/17

THE MAIN EVENT

  • Body position
    • The female must be slightly elevated above the nest cup to allow enough room for the egg to come out.  She assumes a squatting or crouching position, either rising from a resting position or moving to the cup from another part of the nest.  This squatting is usually clear, but sometimes, if the cup is very deep or if she is already incubating an egg or two, it is difficult to detect any lifting of her body.
    • The body will be nearly parallel with the nest or at an angle of about 10-15 degrees with the tail low or flat on the nest.  Wings may be pulled in tight or may bulge out slightly.
    • She may look intently down into the nest cup in front of her.
  • Behavior
    • She may unfold and refold one wing and then the other over her back once or several times, and settle her feet into the cup.
    • She may release a small amount of wastes into the nest, clearing her cloaca for the egg.  The tail usually flips up slightly for this.
    • She may remain very still, seemingly unfocused, or she may look around even during contractions.
    • Her body feathers may fluff outward.
  • Contractions may be marked by any of the following:
    • Her upper back and shoulders may constrict clearly with each contraction.
    • Feathers on her nape, back, sides, and wings may shudder, lift, and/or fluff out with contractions.
    • Her wings may flex outward slightly with each contraction.
    • She usually toggles from foot to foot after each contraction.
    • Her tail may rise slightly with each contraction.
    • Her body may tip backward and forward slightly.
    • She may exhale soft whistles and/or chirps with each contraction.
    • She may lower down further into cup, head hunkered into her shoulders.
    • She may spread her wings at the elbow and appear to prop herself on them during contractions.
  • Visible contractions may last as briefly as 1-2 minutes or as long as 7-8 minutes.
  • Final push is always marked by an end of the contractions. It may also be marked by:
    • Shaking and shuddering of the entire body.
    • A final loud chirp or whistle.
    • A quick, sharp flip of the tail.
    • A dramatic jump and spreading up and/or outward or flapping of the wings.
    • Hardly any detectable movement at all, in which case the cessation of contractions is the only clear indication that the egg has emerged.
  • After the final push any of the following may occur:
    • She may become very still for several minutes.
    • She may rise, look around, or shake her head.
    • She may turn her head and quickly wipe her beak on her wing or scapular feathers.
    • She may look directly down into the cup where the egg lies.

POSTLUDE

  • She begins incubating after laying, but this may occur in one of several ways:
    • She may immediately step up and out of the nest cup and examine the new egg, nudge or roll it, lower herself and shimmy her brood patch onto the egg(s), and settle into incubating.
    • She may remain in a squat above the egg(s) for as long as 20-30 minutes, staying still or perhaps looking around before she steps aside to check the new egg.
    • She may stand aside or above the egg leaving it exposed for many minutes before incubating.
    • She may not step aside at all but immediately or after a few minutes simply lower herself over the cup and begin incubating, in which case the egg may not be seen for many minutes or even hours.

elfruler’s YouTube channel has dozens of videos of oviposition at eagle cams from 2011 to the present.

© elfruler and Donna Young 2018